Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure - 1350 Words

COMES NOW the Defendant, Josue Emmanuel Rivera-Lemus, by and through counsel, Vernida R. Chaney, and pursuant to18 U.S.C.  § 3553(a), Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Section 6A1. 2 the United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual (â€Å"U.S.S.G.† or the â€Å"Guidelines†), United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), United States v. Hughes, 401 F.3d 540 (4th Cir. 2005), and this Court’s Policy Regarding Procedure to be followed in Sentencing, represents that he has reviewed the Probation Office’s Presentence Investigation Report and submits the Defendant’s Position with Respect to Sentencing to aid the Court in determining an appropriate sentence. I. LEGAL STANDARD In United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), the Supreme Court held the Sentencing Guidelines are purely advisory and required that sentencing courts consider both the Guidelines and the 18 U.S.C  § 3553(a) factors in sentencing. Id. at 264. Pursuant to 3553, the court shall impose a sentence â€Å"sufficient, but not greater than necessary† to comply with the purpose set forth in subsection (2); (a) to reflect the seriousness of the offense, promote respect of the law, and to provide just punishment for the offense, (b) to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct, (c) to protect the public from further crimes of the defendant, and (d) to provide the defendant with needed educational or vocational training, medical care, or other correctional treatment in the most effective manner.Show MoreRelatedEthics Of Electronic Search And Seizure Essay1521 Words   |  7 Pagesand ethics of the amendment to Rule 41 (Search and Seizure) of the federal rules of criminal pro cedure (FRCP). The ethical theory used to analyze the amendment to rule 41 of the FRCP is act utilitarianism (based off of the ‘greatest happiness principle’) which states that an action is considered moral if its benefits exceeds the harms to the affected parties. With the use of this ethical theory of act utilitarianism, it will be demonstrated that the amendment to to Rule 41 pertaining to electronic remoteRead MoreDifference Between Civil Law And Criminal Procedure700 Words   |  3 Pagesbetween civil procedure and criminal procedure is that in a criminal procedure the rules that apply in a criminal case and determine how a criminal case proceeds through the legal system. They are based on federal and state constitutions, codes, rules of court, and cases. Whereas, with a civil procedure the rules that apply in a civil case determine how a civil case proceeds through the legal system. Moreover, in federal courts many of the rules are found in the Federal Rules of C ivil Procedure and theRead MoreCriminal Evidence Essay1536 Words   |  7 Pagesfundamental normative rules about what is allowed of people or owed to people. There are many types of rights in our society. In addition to the Constitution, court decisions and statutes are important sources of rights, and so are state constitutions. The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure sometimes shed light on and clarify important rulings handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court. Additionally, the Federal Rules set forth the criminal procedure guidelines that federal criminal justice practitionersRead MoreThe Warren Court And The Criminal Justice Revolution Of The 1960 S1605 Words   |  7 Pagess name has become the shorthand for a jurisprudential shift from state toward federal authority; the Warren Court offered an expansive understanding of the role federal courts could play in enabling access for a host of new claimants seeking an array of rights† (Resnik 2012). Earl Warren’s cou rt and jurisprudence is best known for cases on expansion of federal habeas corpus, expansion on the law of criminal procedure, expansion on free expression and exercise of religion, and desegregation publicRead MoreThe Evolution of the Exclusionary Rule1733 Words   |  7 Pages The Evolution of the Exclusionary Rule A Historical Analysis And How It Stand Today April Herald Criminal Justice Abstract From historical analysis, this work highlights key cases that have influenced the evolution of the Exclusionary rule and where it stands today. The purpose of this paper is to inform people of the importance of our constitutional rights, especially the fourth amendment when concerning a criminal prosecution. The exclusionary rule is set in place to ensure justice beRead MoreCriminal Justice and Leading U.S. Supreme Court Cases, Annotated Bibliography1035 Words   |  5 PagesAnnotated Bibliography Champion, D.J. (2009). Leading U.S. supreme court cases in criminal justice: Briefs and key terms. Upper Saddle river, NJ: Prentice Hall. Leading U.S. supreme court cases in criminal justice: Briefs and key terms is a source reference with respect to criminal law, constitutional law, and criminal procedure. The major focus of this book includes explained mandates of over 1000 U.S. Supreme Court cases and this book details key terms and definitions. Grant, H.B. and Terry,Read MoreThe Economic Crisis Of Brazil1395 Words   |  6 Pages Brazil Historical Development While Brazil development state began in the response of the Great Depression during the economic crisis. The second section of this report describes the formal protection of human rights in the Brazilian criminal justice system, but also explains why these guarantees remain largely on paper. An understanding of why the Brazilian state appears to violate so many of the human rights that its own laws and Constitution guarantee requires some description of the historicalRead More Tribunals Essays1344 Words   |  6 Pagesterrorists has set off a major debate on civil liberties in the United States. Supporters argue that such a measure is a constitutional necessity to address terrorism of an unprecedented scope. Opponents claim that the tribunals would undermine the rule of law and deprive defendants of the protection provided for in the American system of justice. My research and personnel experience on the subject has found the tribunals to be in direct accordance of what the Preside nt of the United States his chargedRead MoreExclusionary Rule: How, When, and Why Was it Established? Essay examples967 Words   |  4 Pageshave been sitting in our jails and prisons were it not for the introduction of the exclusionary rule. The Exclusionary Rule is a law passed by the United States Supreme Court. It demands that â€Å"any evidence obtained by police using methods that violate a person’s constitutional rights be excluded from use in a criminal prosecution against that person† (Ferdico, Fradella, and Totten, 2009). Before this rule, under common law, evidence was acknowledged in court as long as it satisfied evidentiary criteriaRead MoreCriminal Procedure Essay1419 Words   |  6 PagesUniversity law professor Herbert Packer, represents two opposing method of principles functioning within criminal justice system. Although the models describe the important facets of the politics and practice of criminal justice, both have been criticized since presented by Packer in 1964. Presently both models are acknowledged as imperfect standards to explain the politics and law of criminal justice. The crime control ideal represents traditional principles, whereas the due process belief reflects